Date:
This article was written by
Diploma in Business Law (University of Applied Sciences), Partner, Tax & Legal
German Indirect Tax
German Indirect Tax
The EU intends to replace the existing safeguard measures, which are due to expire at the end of June 2026, and is expected to introduce new measures from 1 July 2026. As things stand, the framework for these measures is as follows:
These planned EU steel tariffs will fundamentally alter the operating environment for industrial companies in Europe. The automotive industry, mechanical engineering, and energy- and material-intensive sectors with global supply chains will be particularly affected.
With stricter protective measures against steel imports, reduced import quotas and potential punitive tariffs of up to 50 per cent, companies face a significant increase in costs, regulatory requirements and risks relating to customs and trade compliance.
At the same time, new requirements such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) are increasing the pressure on procurement, supply chain management and sustainability functions. Companies must therefore adapt their procurement strategies, supply chains and customs processes at an early stage.
At present, the planned EU steel measures do not yet constitute a definitively adopted EU regulation. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union have reached a political agreement on the new measures as part of the trilogue. However, formal adoption and publication in the Official Journal of the EU are still pending.
In terms of content, the key points are already largely considered to be set. Among other things, the measures envisage significantly reduced duty-free steel import quotas as well as punitive tariffs of up to 50 per cent on import volumes exceeding defined quotas. Implementation is currently expected from 1 July 2026.
This is already relevant for companies today. Supply chains, procurement strategies and price trends react early to regulatory changes – particularly in industries with long-term procurement and production cycles.
Hardly any other sector will feel the impact more keenly than the European automotive industry. Steel remains one of the most important materials in vehicle manufacturing – for both traditional combustion engines and electric vehicles. Body structures, chassis, safety components and battery housings are directly dependent on steel price trends.
The new EU steel tariffs are likely to lead to rising steel prices within Europe. For OEMs, this means additional pressure on margins and cost structures. At the same time, higher material costs can only be passed on to customers to a limited extent in the face of international competition.
The situation is particularly critical for suppliers. Tier 1 and Tier 2 companies often operate on significantly lower margins than vehicle manufacturers and have only limited scope to pass on price increases along the supply chain.
Consequently, the pressure for consolidation within the European supplier industry continues to rise.
The impact of EU steel tariffs extends far beyond the automotive sector. As Europe’s largest industrial hub, Germany is particularly affected. Mechanical engineering, plant engineering, the construction industry and industrial manufacturing companies are among the largest steel consumers within the European Union.
Rising steel prices not only increase production costs but also weaken the international competitiveness of European suppliers in the long term. German industrial companies, in particular, compete globally on the basis of quality, efficiency and cost structure. Higher raw material costs therefore strike directly at the heart of the European export model.
At the same time, with the new steel measures, the EU is pursuing a strategic industrial policy agenda. The aim is to secure critical industrial capacities more firmly within Europe and to reduce dependence on global supply chains.
The pandemic, geopolitical conflicts and increasing trade disputes have shown just how vulnerable international raw material and supply structures have become.
However, this creates a fundamental conflict of objectives: in many areas, greater industrial resilience also means higher structural costs.
With the new steel import quotas and protective measures, the demands on customs and trade compliance are rising significantly.
In future, companies must monitor the following much more precisely:
Errors in tariff classification or determining origin can have significant financial consequences – particularly when punitive tariffs of up to 50 per cent apply.
In addition, the risk of regulatory audits in connection with circumvention supply chains or incorrectly declared countries of origin is increasing.
The new EU steel tariffs are thus making trade compliance an increasingly strategic competitive factor.
Furthermore, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) further tightens the regulatory requirements for steel imports.
In future, importers will not only have to comply with trade policy requirements but also take into account CO₂-related reporting obligations and costs. Steel imports will thus be regulated both under customs law and climate policy.
This creates a double burden for companies arising from:
CBAM is thus becoming a key driver for procurement, supply chain management and sustainability strategies.
Many companies are already responding by regionalising their procurement more extensively. European supply chains are gaining in importance, long-term contracts with local steel producers are becoming more significant, and dependence on the global spot market is decreasing.
At the same time, so-called ‘green steel’ is increasingly becoming a strategic competitive factor. Sustainability requirements, ESG criteria and CO₂ reduction targets mean that steel is no longer viewed solely as a raw material, but also as a compliance and sustainability product.
For companies, this means that procurement, customs, sustainability and supply chain management are becoming increasingly intertwined.
The new EU steel measures significantly increase the complexity of international trade. Traditional customs processes are often no longer sufficient to efficiently manage regulatory risks, quota management and rising documentation requirements.
BDO supports companies in
Particularly in sectors such as automotive, mechanical engineering, industrial plant engineering, robotics, automation technology, and handling and lifting technology, the integration of procurement, supply chain, sustainability and customs functions is becoming increasingly important.
Companies require integrated data and process landscapes to be able to assess and manage regulatory requirements in real time.
Technology-enabled customs and trade compliance solutions enable, among other things:
Against a backdrop of geopolitical uncertainties and increasing regulatory intervention, trade compliance is thus evolving from an operational compliance function into a strategic competitive factor.
Conclusion: EU steel tariffs are bringing about lasting changes to cost structures and supply chains
The new EU steel tariffs mark a profound shift in European industrial policy. Whilst the European steel industry is to be protected and stabilised, costs, regulatory requirements and operational complexity are rising for the manufacturing sector.
Particularly for the automotive, mechanical engineering and industrial supply chains, a new environment is emerging in which trade compliance, procurement strategy and supply chain resilience are becoming key competitive factors.
Companies that react early and adapt their processes accordingly can reduce risks and secure strategic advantages in an increasingly regulated market.