Updates
Date:
This article was written by
Certified Tax Advisor, Lawyer, Director, National Office Tax & Legal
Certified Tax Advisor, Manager, National Office Tax & Legal
A signing bonus is a sum of money paid to a prospective employee upon the conclusion of an employment contract or to encourage existing employees to renew their contracts. Such signing bonuses are particularly common in professional soccer in connection with player transfers. Following rulings on the accounting treatment of transfer fees (signing bonuses) and commissions for player recruitment, the German Federal Fiscal Court (BFH) has now issued a decision on these signing bonuses in its decision of March 3, 2026 (case no. IX R 33/23) and established principles for their treatment.
In the case in question, a professional soccer club agreed with its players to pay signing bonuses upon the conclusion of their employment contracts; there was no obligation to repay the bonuses in the event of early termination of the contract. The club treated the signing bonuses paid as business expenses that directly reduced taxable income. The tax office viewed the employment contracts and the signing bonuses as so closely linked that they should be regarded as consideration for the player’s commitment to the club for the duration of the employment relationship and therefore allocated over the agreed duration of the employment relationship. Accordingly, deferred income should be capitalized. The Fiscal Tax Court (FG), however, classified the signing bonus solely as a payment for signing the employment contract (“signing fee”), and therefore found that there was no time-related consideration required for the capitalization of a deferred income item.
The BFH extended the distinction previously applied in the accounting treatment of transfer fees (transfer payments) and commissions for player recruitment - regarding the existence or absence of a transfer obligation - to signing bonuses as well.
Accordingly, a signing bonus paid to a player transferring for a transfer fee may be included in the capitalizable acquisition costs of the intangible asset “player license.” This is because if a club must pay a transfer fee to the player’s previous club in order to obtain the right to field the player in licensed competition, this constitutes consideration for the acquisition of this asset. If, on the other hand, the conclusion of an employment contract is a prerequisite for the issuance of the player license, the signing bonus paid in this context constitutes incidental acquisition costs. The signing bonus constitutes acquisition-related expenses that are directly attributable to the intangible asset “player license.”
In line with previous case law, the BFH further confirms that it is irrelevant that, from the beneficiary player’s perspective, the signing bonus constitutes a component of salary and thus income from employment; rather, classification as incidental acquisition costs depends solely on the intended purpose of the expenses from the perspective of the entity preparing the financial statements.
If, on the other hand, a player transfers on a free transfer or simply has his employment contract extended, this does not constitute an acquisition, as there is no purchase of the intangible asset “playing rights” for consideration. In such cases, the signing bonus is paid solely in connection with the conclusion or extension of the contract. Consequently, incidental acquisition costs do not apply.
To the extent that signing bonuses are not capitalized as incidental acquisition costs of an intangible asset, a distinction must be made based on the reason for the payments: If the payment constitutes an advance on salary, it must be capitalized and amortized over the term of the contract. However, if the player’s consideration is limited to the signing of the contract, the time-related nature required for the recognition of a deferred income account is lacking. In this respect, these constitute immediately deductible business expenses.
The BFH reversed the judgement and remanded the case to the FG for further investigation and a new decision. This is because, at least with regard to the signing bonuses paid in connection with transfers subject to a transfer fee, the FG must reassess the case in accordance with the legal principles clearly set forth by the BFH and in light of the applicable licensing regulations.
Notice:
While such signing bonuses are particularly widespread in professional sports, they are also found in other industries and at certain hierarchical levels — particularly given the current shortage of skilled workers. Furthermore, headhunter fees, for example, should be classified similarly. In this regard, the legal principles established by the Federal Fiscal Court (BFH) regarding their treatment in financial statements apply accordingly. In the absence of comparable transfer fees, the distinction between deferred income and immediately deductible business expenses is likely to be particularly relevant in practice. In this regard, the specific circumstances — especially the individual contractual agreements — must be carefully documented and taken into account.